<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: “Lazy Canadian ETF” Portfolio Update – 5 Years Later $$	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://phantasmix.com/lazy-canadian-etf-portfolio-update-5-years-later/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://phantasmix.com/lazy-canadian-etf-portfolio-update-5-years-later/</link>
	<description>Stock Market and Personal Finance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2012 04:39:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Phantasmix		</title>
		<link>https://phantasmix.com/lazy-canadian-etf-portfolio-update-5-years-later/comment-page-1/#comment-5176</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phantasmix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2012 04:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://phantasmix.com/?p=5076#comment-5176</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi there,
1) The returns do include dividends, as noted above;
2) This doesn&#039;t account for the tax you would have paid on the distributions. Not worth it at all.

The point was to test what is an &lt;strong&gt;average portfolio&lt;/strong&gt;, recommended in the Canadian mags such as MoneySense.

I&#039;m PRO individual dividend-paying stocks. But I&#039;m even more pro writing calls on them. With these ETFs you can&#039;t even do that.

Thanks for the feedback!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,<br />
1) The returns do include dividends, as noted above;<br />
2) This doesn&#8217;t account for the tax you would have paid on the distributions. Not worth it at all.</p>
<p>The point was to test what is an <strong>average portfolio</strong>, recommended in the Canadian mags such as MoneySense.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m PRO individual dividend-paying stocks. But I&#8217;m even more pro writing calls on them. With these ETFs you can&#8217;t even do that.</p>
<p>Thanks for the feedback!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Charles		</title>
		<link>https://phantasmix.com/lazy-canadian-etf-portfolio-update-5-years-later/comment-page-1/#comment-5175</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2012 04:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://phantasmix.com/?p=5076#comment-5175</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[IN a sideways market always good to have some dividend producing stocks and even a few bond funds which are doing well. You may have picked too broad a base.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IN a sideways market always good to have some dividend producing stocks and even a few bond funds which are doing well. You may have picked too broad a base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
