<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: A Case for Natural Gas	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://phantasmix.com/a-case-for-natural-gas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://phantasmix.com/a-case-for-natural-gas/</link>
	<description>Stock Market and Personal Finance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 02:59:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Phantasmix		</title>
		<link>https://phantasmix.com/a-case-for-natural-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-615</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phantasmix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 04:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phantasmix.com/index.php/2007/08/10/a-case-for-natural-gas/#comment-615</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I should&#039;ve mentioned my time horizon: under 4 months. I want to try timing it and catch a few points on the way up.

Futures are up, hurricane season may soon start, and I see UNG going up. I think a lot of people may buy into this ETF without looking into the MER and other details. Seriously... 

Right now I&#039;m 1.5% up after commissions both ways. My target is around 10% net and then I&#039;m out. According to the link you posted this is just the right strategy for UNG (short- to mid-term hold).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should&#8217;ve mentioned my time horizon: under 4 months. I want to try timing it and catch a few points on the way up.</p>
<p>Futures are up, hurricane season may soon start, and I see UNG going up. I think a lot of people may buy into this ETF without looking into the MER and other details. Seriously&#8230; </p>
<p>Right now I&#8217;m 1.5% up after commissions both ways. My target is around 10% net and then I&#8217;m out. According to the link you posted this is just the right strategy for UNG (short- to mid-term hold).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: macdonald		</title>
		<link>https://phantasmix.com/a-case-for-natural-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-614</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[macdonald]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 02:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phantasmix.com/index.php/2007/08/10/a-case-for-natural-gas/#comment-614</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Some say you are better off investing in producers unhedged to spot prices than buying a commodity ETF like UNG. Itâ€<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.1.0/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />s not just the cost of the MER. When future prices are in contango (far contracts have higher prices) like natural gas is now, the ETF has another hurdle to overcome: the roll of the contracts toward expiration. Say the fund buys the 4 month futures contract at $20 when the spot price is $15; then as the contract rolls toward expiration, its price declines toward the spot price. So even if the altter stays the same, the ETF will show a loss equal to the MER plus the decline in the futures from $20 to $15. This link explains it more (see Jbianoâ€<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.1.0/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />s comments especially)
http://etf.seekingalpha.com/article/32864]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some say you are better off investing in producers unhedged to spot prices than buying a commodity ETF like UNG. Itâ€™s not just the cost of the MER. When future prices are in contango (far contracts have higher prices) like natural gas is now, the ETF has another hurdle to overcome: the roll of the contracts toward expiration. Say the fund buys the 4 month futures contract at $20 when the spot price is $15; then as the contract rolls toward expiration, its price declines toward the spot price. So even if the altter stays the same, the ETF will show a loss equal to the MER plus the decline in the futures from $20 to $15. This link explains it more (see Jbianoâ€™s comments especially)<br />
<a href="http://etf.seekingalpha.com/article/32864" rel="nofollow ugc">http://etf.seekingalpha.com/article/32864</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
