<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Case for Natural Gas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phantasmix.com/a-case-for-natural-gas.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phantasmix.com/a-case-for-natural-gas.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-case-for-natural-gas</link>
	<description>Trading stocks and options -- contact @ phantasmix.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:10:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phantasmix</title>
		<link>http://phantasmix.com/a-case-for-natural-gas.html/comment-page-1#comment-615</link>
		<dc:creator>Phantasmix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 04:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phantasmix.com/index.php/2007/08/10/a-case-for-natural-gas/#comment-615</guid>
		<description>I should&#039;ve mentioned my time horizon: under 4 months. I want to try timing it and catch a few points on the way up.

Futures are up, hurricane season may soon start, and I see UNG going up. I think a lot of people may buy into this ETF without looking into the MER and other details. Seriously... 

Right now I&#039;m 1.5% up after commissions both ways. My target is around 10% net and then I&#039;m out. According to the link you posted this is just the right strategy for UNG (short- to mid-term hold).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should&#8217;ve mentioned my time horizon: under 4 months. I want to try timing it and catch a few points on the way up.</p>
<p>Futures are up, hurricane season may soon start, and I see UNG going up. I think a lot of people may buy into this ETF without looking into the MER and other details. Seriously&#8230; </p>
<p>Right now I&#8217;m 1.5% up after commissions both ways. My target is around 10% net and then I&#8217;m out. According to the link you posted this is just the right strategy for UNG (short- to mid-term hold).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macdonald</title>
		<link>http://phantasmix.com/a-case-for-natural-gas.html/comment-page-1#comment-614</link>
		<dc:creator>macdonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 02:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phantasmix.com/index.php/2007/08/10/a-case-for-natural-gas/#comment-614</guid>
		<description>Some say you are better off investing in producers unhedged to spot prices than buying a commodity ETF like UNG. Itâ€™s not just the cost of the MER. When future prices are in contango (far contracts have higher prices) like natural gas is now, the ETF has another hurdle to overcome: the roll of the contracts toward expiration. Say the fund buys the 4 month futures contract at $20 when the spot price is $15; then as the contract rolls toward expiration, its price declines toward the spot price. So even if the altter stays the same, the ETF will show a loss equal to the MER plus the decline in the futures from $20 to $15. This link explains it more (see Jbianoâ€™s comments especially)
http://etf.seekingalpha.com/article/32864</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some say you are better off investing in producers unhedged to spot prices than buying a commodity ETF like UNG. Itâ€™s not just the cost of the MER. When future prices are in contango (far contracts have higher prices) like natural gas is now, the ETF has another hurdle to overcome: the roll of the contracts toward expiration. Say the fund buys the 4 month futures contract at $20 when the spot price is $15; then as the contract rolls toward expiration, its price declines toward the spot price. So even if the altter stays the same, the ETF will show a loss equal to the MER plus the decline in the futures from $20 to $15. This link explains it more (see Jbianoâ€™s comments especially)<br />
<a href="http://etf.seekingalpha.com/article/32864" rel="nofollow">http://etf.seekingalpha.com/article/32864</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

